From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7DFFFKt069017 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:15:15 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6BA2B4B4E1C for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id cUgKGiqzNIgNGV2r for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Alignment size? Message-ID: <20100813151539.GA22492@infradead.org> References: <4C64715F.8060000@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20100812234911.GC10429@dastard> <4C64E52E.2060806@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Michael Tokarev , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:39:15PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The workaround old versions of mkfs.xfs used was to create the fs > with a sector size of 4k when it detected md raid5 underneath it so > the sb and ag headers were all 4k aligned and sized, just like the > rest of the filesystem.... That workaround is still in latests mkfs.xfs if you build against the internal libdisk instead of libblkid. And that's the case at least for Debian, and probably a few other distributions as well. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs