From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7GMTu0x004933 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:29:57 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EC90512C4F50 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail19.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.104]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kzSrm67pGaHZBAYD for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:30:21 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfsdump-3.0.4 problems Message-ID: <20100816223021.GL10429@dastard> References: <20100816182236.249a2a0f@x2.grafnetz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100816182236.249a2a0f@x2.grafnetz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mario Bachmann Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:22:36PM +0200, Mario Bachmann wrote: > Hello, = > = > my kernel is > Linux x2 2.6.35.2 #1 SMP Sun Aug 15 00:32:14 CEST 2010 x86_64 AMD Athlon(= tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux > = > I get a lot of Warnings with xfsdump-3.0.4 (booth, gentoo package 3.0.4-r= 1 and git-version): > = > x2 ~/source/d/xfsdump/dump # ./xfsdump -l0 -L "Test" - /dev/sda2 |gzip - = > /mnt/data2/dump_text.gz ..... > ./xfsdump: WARNING: could not stat dirent .crack-attack ino 100663674: Da= s Argument ist ung=FCltig: using null generation count in directory entry bulkstat is failing, indicating an invalid option was passed. > With the "old" version xfsdump-3.0.1, I get no warnings! > xfsdump -l0 -L "Test" - /dev/sda2 |gzip - > /mnt/data2/dump301_test.gz > xfsdump: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy > xfsdump: version 3.0.1 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-threaded .... > xfsdump: Dump Status: SUCCESS > = > And the file is 4,8 GB. All seems to be correct! I can't see any changes between 3.0.1 and 3.0.4 that would explain this. Did you run them on the same machine and kernel? Did you build them with the same compiler? If everything is the same, then perhaps you could bisect (only a few changes so should be quick) to point out the offending change. Cheers, Dave. -- = Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs