Re: [META-LIST] Now: perennial "reply-to-all"

Michael Monnerie
2010-08-17T05:31:47Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 756 bytes --]

On Montag, 16. August 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Why does "everyone" on this list "reply-to-all" when 99% of the time
> it is totally unnecessary, redundant, and potentially ruffles a
> sender's feathers, as in this case?

I'm also on several lists, but the only list where reply-to-all is used
is this one - so I followed the way it's done here without having
questioned why.

--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]