From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7H959T4038410 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:05:10 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A4BFB1D759D9 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail19.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.104]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FCyGbuitpS7qy4Yt for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:05:34 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfsdump-3.0.4 problems Message-ID: <20100817090534.GP10429@dastard> References: <20100816182236.249a2a0f@x2.grafnetz> <20100816223021.GL10429@dastard> <20100817083227.06e23889@x2.grafnetz> <20100817071337.GN10429@dastard> <20100817095340.6b9ab8e2@x2.grafnetz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100817095340.6b9ab8e2@x2.grafnetz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mario Bachmann Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:53:40AM +0200, Mario Bachmann wrote: > Am Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:13:37 +1000 > schrieb Dave Chinner : > > > Compiler: I use "gcc (Gentoo 4.4.4-r1 p1.0, pie-0.4.5) 4.4.4". > > > > > > Testing List (on one machine only): > > > works: x86_64, 2.6.34.4, xfsdump-3.0.1 > > > works: x86_64, 2.6.34.4, xfsdump-3.0.4 > > > failure: x86_64, 2.6.35.2, xfsdump-3.0.1 (worked only one time) > > > failure: x86_64, 2.6.35.2, xfsdump-3.0.4 > > > > Ok, that makes more sense - we changed the way bulkstat works in > > from 2.6.34 to 2.6.35 to correctly validate inode numbers being > > passed in via bulkstat, and hence files unlinked during the dump run > > could return EINVAL when validating the directory structure (as they > > no longer exist). Is you system completely idle while the dump > > is running, or are files being removed while the dump is running? > > I would call my system idle, when I use xfsdump. No rm or mv operations > are running while the dump. The first machine has a dual core 2.9 GHz and > 8 GB of RAM and the filesystems are not really big (~10GB used). The second > machine has a dual core 2 GHz and 2 GB of RAM. Yup, I have reproduced it here. What is strange is that xfs_fsr uses XFS_IOC_BULKSTAT_SINGLE, and that works fine on 2.6.35.2. The same ioctl calls from xfsdump are failing, though, so something funny is going on there. I'll look into it further. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs