From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o7JC32kh170057 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:03:04 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3BF1CCEA7FE for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LZENIMVfL5hYdPHA for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:03:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: LWN.net article: The end of block barriers Message-ID: <20100819120330.GA9358@infradead.org> References: <201008191333.55503@zmi.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008191333.55503@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Monnerie Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:33:55PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/400541/c95bd1b7d2a7b5d5/ > > A good article, but it leaves some questions open. I've asked them in > the article's discussions, maybe an answer is already there. Just take a look at the linux-fsevel list where all this work is happening right now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs