public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: handle negative wbc->nr_to_write during sync writeback
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:28:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100823132829.GB15918@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282565437-13880-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:10:37PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> During data integrity (WB_SYNC_ALL) writeback, wbc->nr_to_write will
> go negative on inodes with more than 1024 dirty pages due to
> implementation details of write_cache_pages(). Currently XFS will
> abort page clustering in writeback once nr_to_write drops below
> zero, and so for data integrity writeback we will do very
> inefficient page at a time allocation and IO submission for inodes
> with large numbers of dirty pages.
> 
> Fix this by only aborting the page clustering code when
> wbc->nr_to_write is negative and the sync mode is WB_SYNC_NONE.

Looks okay, but I wonder why if we should remove the check entirely.
We're clustering inside the same extent, and we already have a cap
for the extent size.  That means the additional I/O basically is for
free and we really shouldn't let the writeback code restrict us here.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2010-08-23 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-23 12:10 [PATCH] xfs: handle negative wbc->nr_to_write during sync writeback Dave Chinner
2010-08-23 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100823132829.GB15918@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox