public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: separate project quota from group quota (questions, design issues)
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:24:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009051924.36443.arekm@maven.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100904233053.GA26586@infradead.org>

On Sunday 05 of September 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Thanks for doing this work Arek, I think it will be useful for some
> users and defintively is cleaners than what we have now.
> 
> > I started doing that by splitting every group+project handling code into
> > separate group and project one. Added superblock field for project quota.
> > New feature flag (SEPARATEPQUOTA).
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > If old filesystem (for SEPARATEQUOTA) is mounted then I'll simply load
> > sb_gquotino into mp->m_sb.sb_pquotino which I think is enough to handle
> > old fs (since new kernel operates on separate structures for project
> > quota).
> 
> Do you mean an old filesystem without the SEPARATEQUOTA bit set here?

Yes. When trying to load existing project quota inode in 
xfs_qm_init_quotainos() I'm doing:

+                       if (!xfs_sb_version_hasseparatepquota(&mp->m_sb)) {
+                               ASSERT(!XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp));
+                               mp->m_sb.sb_pquotino = mp->m_sb.sb_gquotino;
+                               mp->m_sb.sb_gquotino = 0;
+                       }

While xfs_mod_sb() now does:

        /*                                                                                                                                                   
         * Filesystem has no separatepquota turned on,                                                                                                       
         * so we need to store project quota in group                                                                                                        
         * quota inode on disk.                                                                                                                              
         */                                                                                                                                                  
        if (!xfs_sb_version_hasseparatepquota(&mp->m_sb)) {                                                                                                  
                mp->m_sb.sb_gquotino = mp->m_sb.sb_pquotino;                                                                                                 
                mp->m_sb.sb_pquotino = 0;                                                                                                                    
        }  

       xfs_sb_to_disk(XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp), &mp->m_sb, fields);

 [...]
        /*
         * Restore original in-memory project quota inode state.
         */
        if (!xfs_sb_version_hasseparatepquota(&mp->m_sb)) {                                                                                                  
                mp->m_sb.sb_pquotino = mp->m_sb.sb_gquotino;                                                                                                 
                mp->m_sb.sb_gquotino = 0;                                                                                                                    
        }     

so in-memory sb_pquotaino is always used for project quota (regardless of 
SEPARATEPQUOTA feature) while on-disk is depending on SEPARATEPQUOTA feature 
bit. SB modify part is untested yet.

> > Converting old fs to separate quota isn't currently solved. User could
> > need two choices - use old group quota still as group or old group as
> > new project quota. Not sure how to handle these yet.
> 
> We know what sb_gquotino is used for currently from sb_qflags.  If it's
> used for group quota we can simply set the SEPARATEQUOTA bit and we're
> done.  To convert a filesystem using project quotas to SEPARATEQUOTA
> sb_gquotino needs to be cleared and instead the new sb_pquotino field
> needs to point to the project quota inode.

Ok, I'll add new "upgrade <feature>" command to xfs_db (and call it from 
xfs_admin, too) where for now the only feature will be "separatepquota" one.

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-05 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-04  8:00 separate project quota from group quota (questions, design issues) Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2010-09-04 17:13 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-04 23:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-05 17:24   ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [this message]
2010-09-06  1:12     ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06  6:28       ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2010-09-06  1:16   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201009051924.36443.arekm@maven.pl \
    --to=arekm@maven.pl \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox