From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS status update for August 2010
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:10:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201009060710.14479@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C845E71.20902@sandeen.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1279 bytes --]
On Montag, 6. September 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> People need to read up a little and know what they're tuning;
> repeating this kind of suggestion leads to cargo-cultism for
> performance "tuning"
>
> IOW don't turn knobs just because they are there ... :)
Other than most who write here I'm not a developer, but a sysadmin,
responsible for servers of all kind of ages, with XFS usage back to the
early 2.6 series. Default mount options use to change sometimes, and I
can't always check that after a system/kernel upgrade the default
options are satisfied or not. So specifying everything is safe, and
doesn't do any harm - right?
And as it was Sunday morning, I wanted to help out Willy quickly,
without looking specifically which options he would need. I was sure
some of you who know it would guide him later, but maybe only on Monday,
so I took that quick path to find a solution.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-06 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-02 14:59 XFS status update for August 2010 Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-05 7:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-09-05 9:37 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-05 10:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-09-05 13:08 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-05 18:56 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-09-05 23:36 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-06 5:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-09-06 5:49 ` xfs mount/create options (was: XFS status update for August 2010) Michael Monnerie
2010-09-08 5:38 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-08 10:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08 13:38 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-08 14:51 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-08 15:24 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-09-08 23:34 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-08 23:30 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-09 7:27 ` Dave Chinner
2010-09-09 8:29 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-09-06 3:22 ` XFS status update for August 2010 Eric Sandeen
2010-09-06 5:10 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201009060710.14479@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox