From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	o8IBP4KD121380 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:25:05 -0500
Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 769B6131558C
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 04:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by
	cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sO7SkPLdiJdFkjXF for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 04:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:25:42 +0200
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Subject: Re: LWN.net article: creating 1 billion files -> Tests we did
Message-ID: <20100918132542.4ea69d96@galadriel.home>
In-Reply-To: <19603.49533.447686.734866@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
References: <201008191312.49346@zmi.at>
	<20100916121350.3ab30ca5@harpe.intellique.com>
	<4C9291C3.7000709@hardwarefreak.com>
	<19603.49533.447686.734866@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Peter Grandi <pg@xfs2.for.sabi.co.UK>
Cc: Linux XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

Le Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:29:01 +0100 vous =E9criviez:

> [ ... useless run of something misrepresented as a test ... ]

I won't comment on the usefulness of your rant, though, because I'd
rather stay amiable.

If you don't mind, I'll however post complementary results of the same
test running on different filesystems on the very same hardware,
because apparently you missed the fact that this was about tracking
comparative xfs progress in some metadata intensive workloads. =


-- =

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs