From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8MHXGe4074132 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:33:16 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B3437183C8AE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8sVvsSEVm1vW4Gs4 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:34:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:34:10 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] xfs: batch inode reclaim lookup Message-ID: <20100922173410.GF5697@infradead.org> References: <1285137869-10310-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1285137869-10310-14-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1285137869-10310-14-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:44:26PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > This is based on ideas suggested in a proof-of-concept patch > posted by Nick Piggin. Hmm, I can't remember seeing that patch. But the code itself looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs