From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o950OXmG125255 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:24:34 -0500 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 15ABAC2514 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail13.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.98]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id H9t49K8wVUNlh8MJ for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:25:31 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state Message-ID: <20101005002531.GK4681@dastard> References: <20101004224830.GJ30524@hostway.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101004224830.GJ30524@hostway.ca> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Simon Kirby Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:48:30PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote: > Out of the blue, while running postfix+mailscanner: > False positive - reclaim will never be attempting to lock an active inode. IIRC The page cache allocation in .36 now uses GFP_NOFS, so this should go away when you update to a newer kernel. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs