From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9A83xan251033 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 03:03:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 04:05:02 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Fix some file permission. Message-ID: <20101010080502.GA6674@infradead.org> References: <4CAE483F.1020608@sgi.com> <1286660111.5392.6.camel@doink> <20101010015723.GM4681@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101010015723.GM4681@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Alain Renaud , Alex Elder On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:57:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > This looks good to me but I'd like a second opinion, > > to make sure there's no reason any of these should > > be non-executable. > > I don't think it matters. Consistency is good, though, and we've > taken patches like this in the past. Yeah. Btw, I'm not sure git-am can apply the mode changes from a patch, in the worst case you might have to do the chmod calls manually. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs