From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9F9CLwP118110 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:12:22 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8FCE5191EC67 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 8pB6DvQA7M4ogVhi for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:13:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: kernel crash 2.6.31.14-0.1-xen from openSUSE 11.2 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:13:27 +0200 References: <201010092355.17240@zmi.at> <4CB62DBC.9060808@sandeen.net> <201010140718.38589@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: <201010140718.38589@zmi.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010151113.27748@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5707852055621090339==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Cc: Eric Sandeen --===============5707852055621090339== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1734835.7qxyg9mSOZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1734835.7qxyg9mSOZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote: > > >> [1172140.926859] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at > > >> 00000003d03dd178 [1172140.926877] IP: [] > > >> dequeue_task+0x72/0x110 [1172140.926897] PGD 1b54b067 PUD 0 > > >> [1172140.926897] Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted > > >>=20 > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >=20 > > Awesome, that's the 2nd time in like 4 years I've seen that stack > > canary I put in actually be useful ;) >=20 > And both times reported by me :-) > Not that I'm especially excited to have that problem though :-( >=20 > What should I report where (upstream?) to get that fixed? Is it the same bug as here? Then it has been fixed: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D614670 =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=C3=BCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=C3=A4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart1734835.7qxyg9mSOZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAky4GzcACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRUaQCgklyPT9SC9VtXJQ8oYcha7UAE QkoAoIhh06BM4nGUz4Ahe/riNBQAaRS+ =jDP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1734835.7qxyg9mSOZ-- --===============5707852055621090339== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============5707852055621090339==--