From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9MCmFQW178154 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:48:15 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 5FEE415FA301 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id xhCQS8khfySOO5fx for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:49:29 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Implementing checksums in XFS Message-ID: <20101022124928.GA16437@infradead.org> References: <4CC14C1B.5060409@ics.forth.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC14C1B.5060409@ics.forth.gr> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Yannis Klonatos Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:32:27AM +0300, Yannis Klonatos wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask whether, since implementing checksums > seams to be the current trend for file-systems > (e.g. EXT4, BTRFS), anyone is planning on providing such > functionality for XFS also. Yes, it's work in progress that has been stalled a little. See: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00200.html for some more details. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs