* Re: Implementing checksums in XFS [not found] <4CC14C1B.5060409@ics.forth.gr> @ 2010-10-22 12:49 ` Christoph Hellwig 2010-10-22 20:55 ` Michael Monnerie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-10-22 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yannis Klonatos; +Cc: xfs On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:32:27AM +0300, Yannis Klonatos wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to ask whether, since implementing checksums > seams to be the current trend for file-systems > (e.g. EXT4, BTRFS), anyone is planning on providing such > functionality for XFS also. Yes, it's work in progress that has been stalled a little. See: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00200.html for some more details. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Implementing checksums in XFS 2010-10-22 12:49 ` Implementing checksums in XFS Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-10-22 20:55 ` Michael Monnerie 2010-10-25 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Michael Monnerie @ 2010-10-22 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xfs [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 840 bytes --] On Freitag, 22. Oktober 2010 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, it's work in progress that has been stalled a little. See: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00200.html for some more > details. Oh that would be very welcome. A "secure" filesystem sounds really good, especially if it's fast as XFS is :-) I'd implement it everywhere immediately as soon as it's available. Will existing XFS's be upgradeable in some way other that backup/restore? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --] _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Implementing checksums in XFS 2010-10-22 20:55 ` Michael Monnerie @ 2010-10-25 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-10-25 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Monnerie; +Cc: xfs On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:55:40PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote: > Oh that would be very welcome. A "secure" filesystem sounds really good, > especially if it's fast as XFS is :-) > I'd implement it everywhere immediately as soon as it's available. Will > existing XFS's be upgradeable in some way other that backup/restore? checksumming inodes and btree nodes means larger data structures for those, so no there's no upgrade path available. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-25 13:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4CC14C1B.5060409@ics.forth.gr>
2010-10-22 12:49 ` Implementing checksums in XFS Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-22 20:55 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-10-25 13:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox