From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9MKsW9U217480 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:54:32 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CE5E511D93D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5OUhdKp3cdd0iUMj for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1510560B for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:55:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E8AD401C3E for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:55:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: Implementing checksums in XFS Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:55:40 +0200 References: <4CC14C1B.5060409@ics.forth.gr> <20101022124928.GA16437@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20101022124928.GA16437@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010222255.40861@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8346304268078069745==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============8346304268078069745== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3710564.P20eEUWALY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart3710564.P20eEUWALY Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Freitag, 22. Oktober 2010 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, it's work in progress that has been stalled a little. See: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-02/msg00200.html for some more > details. Oh that would be very welcome. A "secure" filesystem sounds really good,=20 especially if it's fast as XFS is :-) I'd implement it everywhere immediately as soon as it's available. Will=20 existing XFS's be upgradeable in some way other that backup/restore? =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart3710564.P20eEUWALY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzB+kwACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRs6QCeOCygdslexebnswqXRQD+lv+P 1agAn0La5okQpjt92VRwnEp1yDY01EqZ =iQuP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3710564.P20eEUWALY-- --===============8346304268078069745== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============8346304268078069745==--