From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9OIQn18147497 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:26:49 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 080CAF5D217 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FIH9KBV3zNx7AzPw for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6131442B for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:28:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63105401C3E for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:28:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: Best filesystems ? Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:27:59 +0200 References: <4CBE2403.8070108@hardwarefreak.com> <19651.9652.631329.903552@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <19651.9652.631329.903552@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010242028.00106@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3359793112558971107==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============3359793112558971107== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3718428.blGH6C1jkH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart3718428.blGH6C1jkH Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Samstag, 23. Oktober 2010 Peter Grandi wrote: > * Reiser3 is nice with the right parameters for the few cases > where there is a significant number of small files on a small > storage system accessed by a single process. I still use reiser3 for all servers root filesystems, it's very good for=20 that. Never had a problem.=20 =46or anything else I use XFS for performance reasons. Except for my KDE=20 /home partition, that stays on reiserfs because KDE seems to rely on=20 O_PONIES and crashes lead to zero size config files which is not a lot=20 of fun. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart3718428.blGH6C1jkH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzEerAACgkQzhSR9xwSCbRANwCgsenGzp5Dq4qmeNrBvTf07Ka8 ylwAniimwPyoWT6P59EidRUBXcaT4TZo =t/gq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3718428.blGH6C1jkH-- --===============3359793112558971107== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============3359793112558971107==--