From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9PDiQrx234961 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:44:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:45:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: use a common _filter_test_dir function Message-ID: <20101025134542.GC4235@infradead.org> References: <201010221409.o9ME9OTQ003885@stout.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010221409.o9ME9OTQ003885@stout.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 09:09:24AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Christoph Hellwig suggested that a function similar to the common > "_filter_scratch" function ought to be created to handle filtering > of the TEST_DIR and TEST_DEV variables. This patch implements that. > > The name "_filter_test" seems like it might suggest it does > something different, so I'm calling this one "_filter_test_dir". > This unfortunately makes the "test" and "scratch" functions have > different naming conventions, but I guess we should be accustomed > to that by now (consider "TEST_DIR" and "SCRATCH_MNT"). > > Signed-off-by: Alex Elder Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs