From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o9PELpOv237662 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:21:52 -0500 Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7D6E4151E649 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv14.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JEhZFAtJJKufnNsG for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217106033.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.106.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv2.i.zmi.at", Issuer "power4u.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv14.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6B5B17E for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.72.27.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05365401C3E for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:06:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: XFS Test Results Interpretation Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:06:16 +0200 References: <3C5E029826A0704DB5998577FCFF46F0095A278CEB@dagobah> <4CC5894D.6090409@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: <4CC5894D.6090409@hardwarefreak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201010251606.16653@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6016030843605800027==" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com --===============6016030843605800027== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2664295.82zSuIWjl5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2664295.82zSuIWjl5 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Montag, 25. Oktober 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Kernel: 2.6.18-128.el5 >=20 > You need a much newer kernel. 2.6.18 is ancient released in 2006, > though CentOS have patched the bejesus out of it--128 times. Oh, I didn't look at that. 2.6.18 is a performance killer compared to an actual 2.6.36 kernel.=20 There's been so much work in between. If you can, try a 2.6.36 and=20 compare your performance. Everything will be a lot faster than with=20 2.6.18. You don't need to fiddle with mkfs/mount options, just upgrade=20 the kernel and without any other tuning you will be much faster than=20 before. =2D-=20 mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei H=E4user zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/ --nextPart2664295.82zSuIWjl5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzFjtgACgkQzhSR9xwSCbQ8uQCeJC5v/yuueR30FKliKM9DK8Na VmkAn1G0Z3N6padt3vkQNPaWUjmMwd1d =Fboq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2664295.82zSuIWjl5-- --===============6016030843605800027== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs --===============6016030843605800027==--