From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oA8BNgIx096020 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:23:42 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B8B671C23501 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 03:25:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id BcD4Fppi2237Ehr3 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:25:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:25:09 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks Message-ID: <20101108112509.GA7654@infradead.org> References: <1289206519-18377-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1289206519-18377-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1289206519-18377-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > +/* > + * buffer types > + */ > +#define B_FS_DQUOT 1 > +#define B_FS_AGFL 2 > +#define B_FS_AGF 3 > +#define B_FS_ATTR_BTREE 4 > +#define B_FS_DIR_BTREE 5 > +#define B_FS_MAP 6 > +#define B_FS_INOMAP 7 > +#define B_FS_AGI 8 > +#define B_FS_INO 9 Is there any good reason to keep/reintroduce the buffer types? In this series we're only using the refcounts, and I can't see any good use for the types either. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs