From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:36:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101108113645.GA16418@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289206519-18377-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
I'd be much more happy about fixing this properly in nfsd. But I guess
the fix is simple enough that we can put it into XFS for now. Any
reason you use up a whole int in the inode instead of using a flag in
i_flags?
> -
> - ASSERT(ip->i_delayed_blks == 0);
> + /*
> + * even after flushing the inode, there can still be delalloc
> + * blocks on the inode beyond EOF due to speculative
> + * preallocation. These are not removed until the release
> + * function is called or the inode is inactivated. Hence we
> + * cannot assert here that ip->i_delayed_blks == 0.
> + */
Shouldn't this be in a separate patch given that we can fail the flush
due to iolock contention? I think this and the swapext fix are .37
material in fact.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 8:55 [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 01/16] xfs: fix per-ag reference counting in inode reclaim tree walking Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 02/16] xfs: move delayed write buffer trace Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 03/16] [RFC] xfs: use generic per-cpu counter infrastructure Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 04/16] xfs: dynamic speculative EOF preallocation Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:08 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 05/16] xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-08 23:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 06/16] patch xfs-inode-hash-fake Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 07/16] xfs: convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 23:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-09 3:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-09 5:04 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-10 5:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-10 6:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 08/16] xfs: convert pag_ici_lock to a spin lock Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 23:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 09/16] xfs: convert xfsbud shrinker to a per-buftarg shrinker Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 10/16] xfs: add a lru to the XFS buffer cache Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 23:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 11/16] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 12/16] xfs: bulk AIL insertion during transaction commit Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 13/16] xfs: reduce the number of AIL push wakeups Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 14/16] xfs: remove all the inodes on a buffer from the AIL in bulk Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 15/16] xfs: only run xfs_error_test if error injection is active Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-08 8:55 ` [PATCH 16/16] xfs: make xlog_space_left() independent of the grant lock Dave Chinner
2010-11-08 14:17 ` [PATCH 00/16] xfs: current patch stack for 2.6.38 window Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-09 0:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101108113645.GA16418@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox