From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: nathans@aconex.com
Cc: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>, xfs <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:39:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101109133948.GB2066@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <247647061.18861289303840801.JavaMail.root@acxmail-au2.aconex.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:57:20PM +1100, nathans@aconex.com wrote:
> Update xfsprogs Debian maintainer annotation, bump version.
> ???? ??
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Looks good except for lots of weird chacaters which hopefully only
happen in the mail and not the actual patch.
Alex has various outstanding xfs_metadump updates, can you coordinate
the release with him, as it might be worth picking those up?
> diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION
> index 58a77e2..e68ef43 100644
> --- a/VERSION
> +++ b/VERSION
> @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@
> ??#
> ??PKG_MAJOR=3
> ??PKG_MINOR=1
> -PKG_REVISION=3
> +PKG_REVISION=4
> ??PKG_BUILD=1
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index 24e5c20..1ce0b7e 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +xfsprogs (3.1.4) unstable; urgency=low
> +
> + ??* New upstream release (32 projid resolution, fsr uses /proc/mounts)
> + ??* Annotate Debian packages as being team maintained now.
> + ??* Resolve Lenny upgrade issue with xfsdump (closes: #601988, #601710)
> +
> + -- Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org> ??Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:39:04 +1100
> +
> ??xfsprogs (3.1.3) unstable; urgency=low
> ??
> ???? * New upstream release
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index f429434..401cdab 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> ??Source: xfsprogs
> ??Section: admin
> ??Priority: optional
> -Maintainer: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
> -Uploaders: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
> +Maintainer: XFS Development Team <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
> +Uploaders: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
> ??Build-Depends: uuid-dev, autoconf, debhelper (>= 5), gettext, libtool, libreadline5-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 2.17)
> ??Standards-Version: 3.9.1
> ??Homepage: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
> diff --git a/doc/CHANGES b/doc/CHANGES
> index 4ae94d6..fc42eba 100644
> --- a/doc/CHANGES
> +++ b/doc/CHANGES
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +xfsprogs-3.1.4 (9 November 2010)
> +????????????????- Add projid32bit handling to userspace, resolving type
> +???????????????? ??sizing issues when dealing with 32 bit project ids.
> +????????????????- Make xfs_fsr use /proc/mounts if available.
> +????????????????- Annotate that Debian packages are group maintained.
> +????????????????- Fix a Debian packaging issue causing upgrade pain.
> +
> ??xfsprogs-3.1.3 (26 August 2010)
> ??????????????????- Add xfs_io support for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE
> ??????????????????- Fix depend targets.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
---end quoted text---
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <318337928.18811289303806950.JavaMail.root@acxmail-au2.aconex.com>
2010-11-09 11:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version nathans
2010-11-09 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-09 23:53 ` Nathan Scott
2010-11-10 17:36 ` Alex Elder
2010-11-10 22:19 ` Nathan Scott
2010-11-10 23:32 ` Alex Elder
2010-11-11 3:42 ` Nathan Scott
2010-11-11 16:03 ` Alex Elder
2010-11-11 16:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-11 22:06 ` Nathan Scott
[not found] <1594229862.31491289470719849.JavaMail.root@acxmail-au2.aconex.com>
2010-11-11 10:24 ` nathans
2010-11-11 16:24 ` Alex Elder
2010-11-11 22:02 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101109133948.GB2066@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=anibal@debian.org \
--cc=nathans@aconex.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox