public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS performance oddity
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:30:37 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123123037.GA4851@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123122449.GA4812@amd>

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:24:49PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Running parallel fs_mark (0 size inodes, fsync on close) on a ramdisk
> ends up with XFS in funny patterns.
> 
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system--
> ----cpu----
>  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy
> id wa
> 24  1   6576 166396    252 393676  132  140 16900 80666 21308 104333  1 84 14  1
> 21  0   6712 433856    256 387080  100  224  9152 53487 13677 53732  0 55 45  0
>  2  0   7068 463496    248 389100    0  364  2940 17896 4485 26122  0 33 65  2
>  1  0   7068 464340    248 388928    0    0     0     0   66  207  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 464340    248 388928    0    0     0     0   79  200  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 464544    248 388928    0    0     0     0   65  199  0  0 100  0
>  1  0   7068 464748    248 388928    0    0     0     0   79  201  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 465064    248 388928    0    0     0     0   66  202  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 465312    248 388928    0    0     0     0   80  200  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 465500    248 388928    0    0     0     0   65  199  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 465500    248 388928    0    0     0     0   80  202  0  0 100  0
>  1  0   7068 465500    248 388928    0    0     0     0   66  203  0  0 100  0
>  0  0   7068 465500    248 388928    0    0     0     0   79  200  0  0 100  0
> 23  0   7068 460332    248 388800    0    0  1416  8896 1981 7142  0  1 99  0
>  6  0   6968 360248    248 403736   56    0 15568 95171 19438 110825  1 79 21  0
> 23  0   6904 248736    248 419704  392    0 17412 118270 20208 111396  1 82 17  0
>  9  0   6884 266116    248 435904  128    0 14956 79756 18554 118020  1 76 23  0
>  0  0   6848 219640    248 445760  212    0  9932 51572 12622 76491  0 60 40  0
> 
> Got a dump of sleeping tasks. Any ideas?

Oh, this is with a lot of kernel debug options, including xfs debugging
turned on. So it might not be an interesting performance measurement.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-23 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-23 12:24 XFS performance oddity Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 12:30 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2010-11-23 20:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24  0:50   ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-24  3:15     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24  5:28       ` [PATCH] " Dave Chinner
2010-11-25  4:54         ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101123123037.GA4851@amd \
    --to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox