public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:44:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101124084443.2968d63f@galadriel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEC5E15.7080307@shiftmail.org>

Le Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:36:37 +0100 vous écriviez:

> What would be the advantage of using hardware raid?

More predictable performance under heavy load (nfs kernel server,
typically). BTW the 3Ware is not a very good sata controller; I've found
that it is actually one of the worst of its class when it comes to
IOPS, the Areca 16xx, LSI Megaraid and Adaptec 5xx5 all perform better
as simple controllers in combination with MD (tested with 8 SSDs).

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-24  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-22 19:27 Xfs delaylog hanged up Spelic
2010-11-22 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 11:17   ` Spelic
2010-11-23 13:28     ` Spelic
2010-11-23 20:46     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:14       ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24  0:20         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 13:12           ` Spelic
2010-11-24 21:50             ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:48       ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24  0:36         ` Spelic
2010-11-24  1:40           ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24  6:18           ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-24  7:44           ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2010-11-24  0:58       ` Spelic
2010-11-24  5:44         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 23:34       ` Spelic
2010-11-26  4:20         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 22:52 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 22:43   ` Spelic
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-24  4:03 Richard Scobie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101124084443.2968d63f@galadriel.home \
    --to=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=spelic@shiftmail.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox