public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS performance oddity
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:54:24 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101125045424.GA3532@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101124052823.GD22876@dastard>

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:28:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> xfs: push stale, pinned buffers on trylock failures
> 
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> As reported by Nick Piggin, XFS is suffering from long pauses under
> highly concurrent workloads when hosted on ramdisks. The problem is
> that an inode buffer is stuck in the pinned state in memory and as a
> result either the inode buffer or one of the inodes within the
> buffer is stopping the tail of the log from being moved forward.
> 
> The system remains in this state until a periodic log force issued
> by xfssyncd causes the buffer to be unpinned. The main problem is
> that these are stale buffers, and are hence held locked until the
> transaction/checkpoint that marked them state has been committed to
> disk. When the filesystem gets into this state, only the xfssyncd
> can cause the async transactions to be committed to disk and hence
> unpin the inode buffer.
> 
> This problem was encountered when scaling the busy extent list, but
> only the blocking lock interface was fixed to solve the problem.
> Extend the same fix to the buffer trylock operations - if we fail to
> lock a pinned, stale buffer, then force the log immediately so that
> when the next attempt to lock it comes around, it will have been
> unpinned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

No more stalls, thanks.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2010-11-25  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-23 12:24 XFS performance oddity Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-23 20:58 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24  0:50   ` Nick Piggin
2010-11-24  3:15     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24  5:28       ` [PATCH] " Dave Chinner
2010-11-25  4:54         ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101125045424.GA3532@amd \
    --to=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox