From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Verify filesystem is aligned to stripes
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:16:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101126091622.264830fa@galadriel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEEE9BC.2030401@hardwarefreak.com>
Le Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:57:00 -0600 vous écriviez:
> Looking at the stripe size, which is equal to 64 sectors per array
> member drive (448 sectors total), how exactly is a sub 4KB mail file
> (8 sectors) going to be split up into equal chunks across a 224KB RAID
> stripe?
It won't, it will simply end on one drive (actually one mirror).
However because the mirrors are striped together, all drives in the
array will be sollicited in my experience, that's why you need at least
as many writing threads as there are stripes to reach the top IOPS. In
your case, writing 56 4K files simultaneously will effectively write on
all drives at once, hopefully (depends upon the filesystem allocation
policy though).
> Does 220KB of the stripe merely get wasted?
It's not wasted, it just remains unallocated. What's wasted is
potential IO performance.
What appears from the benchmarks I ran along the year is that anyway
you turn it, whatever caching, command tag queuing and reordering
your're using, a single thread can't reach maximal IOPS throughput on
an array, i. e. writing on all drives simultaneously; a single thread
writing to the fastest RAID 10 with 4K or 8K IOs can't do much better
than with a single drive, 200 to 300 IOPS for a 15k drive.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-24 18:39 Verify filesystem is aligned to stripes Spelic
2010-11-25 5:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 7:00 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-25 10:15 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 22:57 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-26 8:16 ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2010-11-26 12:22 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-26 13:15 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 14:05 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-26 14:36 ` Emmanuel Florac
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-26 2:43 Richard Scobie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101126091622.264830fa@galadriel.home \
--to=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox