From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oATCsLTT162963 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:54:23 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EC4621B0E80 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:56:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DGlHM1OaruPGIxO4 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:56:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:56:01 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: buffer cache shrinker overhaul V2 Message-ID: <20101129125601.GA14222@infradead.org> References: <1290992339-20849-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290992339-20849-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > This series effectively means that the buffer cache can now be made > independent of the page cache as we now have our own optimised > buffer cache reclaim mechanisms. What happened to that part of the first series? Implementing the sub-page blocksize support using kmalloc should be fairly straight forward. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs