From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oATD6Xsr163820 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:06:33 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EC1E91AFC9E for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id hJGnF6xJs6GU3eVh for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:08:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:08:15 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: connect up buffer reclaim priority hooks Message-ID: <20101129130815.GB22293@infradead.org> References: <1290992339-20849-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1290992339-20849-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290992339-20849-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58:59AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Now that the buffer reclaim infrastructure can handle different reclaim > priorities for different types of buffers, reconnect the hooks in the > XFS code that has been sitting dormant since it was ported to Linux. This > should finally give use reclaim prioritisation that is on a par with the > functionality that Irix provided XFS 15 years ago. I think we really should call the buffer type macro fragments, but that can be left for another patch. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs