From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oAULx00C143150 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:59:01 -0600 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 24D0E1C83D72 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:00:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail12.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.97]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ESW2cbbFGB1EPGzL for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:00:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:00:38 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes Message-ID: <20101130220038.GH3556@dastard> References: <1290991431-20519-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1290991431-20519-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20101130170301.GA5712@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101130170301.GA5712@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:03:01PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Did any problems show up with just trying to use an inode flag instead > of the counter? I'd really hate to bloat the inode without reason. None that I've noticed in local testing, but I haven't been focussing on this aspect so I hadn't changed it. I'll change it to a flag, and we can go back to a counter if necessary. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs