From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oBGFitws078673 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:44:56 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 36A971EEAFE for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ML0MEFsqFlyLfEQy for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:46:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:46:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes Message-ID: <20101216154649.GA1388@infradead.org> References: <1292203511-15685-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1292203511-15685-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1292203511-15685-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:25:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > The new counter in the struct xfs_inode fits into a hole in the > structure on 64 bit machines, so does not grow the size of the inode > at all. The count actually is gone now. But this patch totally changes xfstests 203 output for me. Given that the test doesn't care about the allocation pattern it's probably fine, but we'll a fix for the testcase. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs