From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	oBLFDFYl044236 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:13:15 -0600
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 99C962014CD
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dhpiRo8hY3ihTjUp for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:15:11 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/34] xfs: dynamic speculative EOF preallocation
Message-ID: <20101221151511.GA26127@infradead.org>
References: <1292916570-25015-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
	<1292916570-25015-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1292916570-25015-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

This patch causes tesr 014 to take ~ 870 seconds instead of 6, thus
beeing almost 150 times slower on mt 32-bit test VM, so I'll have to NAK
it for now.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs