From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oBN19E6f062319 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:09:14 -0600 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1B36014784EB for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:11:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EijFO1UckK55bdMV for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:11:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:10:59 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Anyone using XFS in production on > 20TiB volumes? Message-ID: <20101223021059.059fa9db@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20101222175611.1c7d5190@harpe.intellique.com> <4D124B71.9030401@sandeen.net> <20101223012655.2681c596@galadriel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:28:29 -0500 (EST) vous =E9criviez: > Hi, I concur, for hardware raid (at least on 3ware cards) I have > found it makes no difference, thanks for confirming. > = > Which RAID cards did you use? Mostly 3Ware until recently, but I switched to Adaptec. However I'm still running tests to sort out any peculiarity - found quite a lot of "features" since 2008 :) -- = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs