From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p04LoaTW046291 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:50:36 -0600 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0C1FF1D0C6D8 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6TwX8drZo8zJsBg1 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:52:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:52:29 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Simultaneously mounting one XFS partition on multiple machines Message-ID: <20110104225229.6aa47710@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Patrick J. LoPresti" Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:46:39 -0800 vous =E9criviez: > If your answer is "Please do not do this; get a clustered filesystem", > then trust me, you are preaching to the choir. = Just as a side note : OCFS2 works well, is present in all major distros, is extremely fast to setup and install, and is only slightly slower than xfs. There is absolutely no valid reason not to use it (GFS OTOH is a complete PITA to setup). Yeah I know, I know... -- = ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs