From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: factor common write setup code
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:26:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110192602.GI25029@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294399825-1157-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:30:24PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> The buffered IO and direct IO write paths share a common set of
> checks and limiting code prior to issuing the write. Factor that
> into a common helper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> index 9ce5e12..d6ff7ff 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c
> @@ -620,6 +620,60 @@ out_lock:
> }
> + xfs_rw_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|*iolock);
it seems cleaner if we left this in the caller so that locking/unlocking
is not spread over N different layers.
Either way the patch looks correct, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-07 11:30 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: prevent corruption due to overlapping AIO DIO V3 Dave Chinner
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: ensure sync write errors are returned Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: factor common post-write isize handling code Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: introduce xfs_rw_lock() helpers for locking the inode Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-10 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: split direct IO write path from xfs_file_aio_write Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: split buffered " Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: factor common write setup code Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-01-07 11:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: serialise unaligned direct IOs Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 19:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-10 23:37 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: prevent corruption due to overlapping AIO DIO V4 Dave Chinner
2011-01-10 23:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: factor common write setup code Dave Chinner
2011-01-04 4:48 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: prevent corruption due to overlapping AIO DIO V2 Dave Chinner
2011-01-04 4:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: factor common write setup code Dave Chinner
2011-01-05 1:55 ` Alex Elder
2011-01-07 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-07 9:20 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110110192602.GI25029@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox