From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: add fpunch command for hole punching via fallocate
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:23:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110118212303.GV28803@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110118131203.GA4349@infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:12:03AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:06:03AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Sounds good. So which do we want, a new command or a new flag? Thanks,
>
> I'll wait for dave to chime in. I think we should absolutely expose
> it as a fallocate flag, but if there's a good reason we can also expose
> it as a separate command.
My reasoning was that:
a) it is consistent with other xfs_io allocation manipulation
command structures such as resvsp/unresvsp
b) "punch" is less to type than "fallocate -p"
c) self documenting in scripts e.g. -c "punch 4k 4k" is much
more obvious than -c "fallocate -p 4k 4k" and saves a man
page lookup when reading the script.
d) punch as a top level command will show up in the "xfs_io
-c help", not require you to know it is a suboption of the
"falloc" command to find out how to use it.
e) the xfs_io command does not have to have the same name
and structure as the underlying API that implements the
functionality the commands execute.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-14 12:52 [PATCH] xfsprogs: add fpunch command for hole punching via fallocate Josef Bacik
2011-01-18 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-18 13:06 ` Josef Bacik
2011-01-18 13:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-18 21:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-01-19 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110118212303.GV28803@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox