From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p0O94YN5073824 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 03:04:34 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0A20728A933 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bBjk9XWNnZiaMegB for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:06:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 04:06:56 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: limit extsize to size of AGs and/or MAXEXTLEN Message-ID: <20110124090656.GE26744@infradead.org> References: <1295411400-15614-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1295411400-15614-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295411400-15614-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:29:59PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > + * Also, for non-realtime files, limit the extent size hint to > + * half the size of the AGs in the filesystem so alignment > + * doesn't result in extents larger than an AG. What do we do about the last AG, which potentionally is smaller than the others? Otherwise looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs