From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p0Q4YK4O114092 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:34:21 -0600 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 21E891A2B3DE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RaEIQbfjWUDhaJaE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:36:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:36:40 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: version dependency question Message-ID: <20110126043640.GA21311@dastard> References: <4D3F5DA4.3070809@hardwarefreak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D3F5DA4.3070809@hardwarefreak.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stan Hoeppner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:32:52PM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Is the delaylog fstab mount option dependent on anything external to the kernel, > such as the mount command, or xfsprogs? Do these need to be updated to take > advantage of '-o delaylog'? No, it's purely a kernel thing... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs