From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p11LCU70242505 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:12:32 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E6E17162A960 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:14:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uP5TKF29nZVxEaN2 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:14:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:14:57 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch] xfsprogs: repair never return if device removed Message-ID: <20110201211457.GA21772@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ajeet Yadav Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:41:16AM +0900, Ajeet Yadav wrote: > I did not receive and response / reviews on patch. The patch looks good, but we'll need a Signed-off-by line to apply it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs