From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: Erik Gulliksson <erik@gulliksson.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:23:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110223162316.45a49880@harpe.intellique.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsfwr5E7KkffwWOweWJLCmaLnLdtYA4g_m--b0@mail.gmail.com>
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:01:09 +0100
Erik Gulliksson <erik@gulliksson.org> écrivait:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Emmanuel Florac
> <eflorac@intellique.com> wrote:
> >
> > What firmware version are you using?
> >
> > ( tw_cli /cX show firmware )
>
> # tw_cli /c0 show firmware
> /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007
>
OK so this is the latest, or close.
>
> >
> > Augh. That sounds pretty bad. What does " tw_cli /cX/uY show all"
> > look like?
>
> Yes, it is bad - a decision has been made to replace these disks with
> "enterprise"-versions (without TLER/ERC problems etc).
Typical error, alas. Save a couple hundred euros with cheap drives, to
store terabytes of data worth a lot.
> Tw_cli produces
> this output for the volume:
>
> # tw_cli /c0/u0 show all
> /c0/u0 status = OK
> /c0/u0 is not rebuilding, its current state is OK
> /c0/u0 is not verifying, its current state is OK
> /c0/u0 is initialized.
> /c0/u0 Write Cache = on
> /c0/u0 Read Cache = Intelligent
> /c0/u0 volume(s) = 1
> /c0/u0 name = xxx
> /c0/u0 serial number = yyy
> /c0/u0 Ignore ECC policy = off
> /c0/u0 Auto Verify Policy = off
> /c0/u0 Storsave Policy = protection
> /c0/u0 Command Queuing Policy = on
> /c0/u0 Rapid RAID Recovery setting = all
> /c0/u0 Parity Number = 2
>
> Unit UnitType Status %RCmpl %V/I/M Port Stripe
> Size(GB)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> u0 RAID-6 OK - - - 256K
> 12572.8
So the RAID array looks OK, the RAID controller doesn't report any
particular problem. You said it was reported as 0 K. Where did you see
0 K reported?
What gives "dmesg | grep 3w-9xxx" ? and "tw_cli alarms" ? Was the
filesystem under heavy write when the problem occured ?
I'd start with launching a RAID verify, to detect and correct possible
on-disk coherency problems (it can't hurt anyway):
tw_cli /c0/u0 start verify
Then "tail -f /var/log/messages | grep 3w-9xxx" ...
I suppose that there are no problems to be discovered. Most probably
IOs to the array were lost because of the bus reset.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@intellique.com>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 13:27 XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 14:46 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 15:01 ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 15:23 ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2011-02-24 10:20 ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 15:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-23 15:37 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 15:42 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-24 10:25 ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-24 10:35 ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-24 11:01 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-24 12:14 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 16:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110223162316.45a49880@harpe.intellique.com \
--to=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=erik@gulliksson.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox