public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: Erik Gulliksson <erik@gulliksson.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:23:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110223162316.45a49880@harpe.intellique.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsfwr5E7KkffwWOweWJLCmaLnLdtYA4g_m--b0@mail.gmail.com>

Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:01:09 +0100
Erik Gulliksson <erik@gulliksson.org> écrivait:

> Hi Emmanuel,
> 
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
> 
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Emmanuel Florac
> <eflorac@intellique.com> wrote:
> >
> > What firmware version are you using?
> >
> > ( tw_cli /cX show firmware )
> 
> # tw_cli /c0 show firmware
> /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 4.10.00.007
> 

OK so this is the latest, or close.

> 
> >
> > Augh. That sounds pretty bad. What does " tw_cli /cX/uY show all"
> > look like?
> 
> Yes, it is bad - a decision has been made to replace these disks with
> "enterprise"-versions (without TLER/ERC problems etc).

Typical error, alas. Save a couple hundred euros with cheap drives, to
store terabytes of data worth a lot.

> Tw_cli produces
> this output for the volume:
> 
> # tw_cli /c0/u0 show all
> /c0/u0 status = OK
> /c0/u0 is not rebuilding, its current state is OK
> /c0/u0 is not verifying, its current state is OK
> /c0/u0 is initialized.
> /c0/u0 Write Cache = on
> /c0/u0 Read Cache = Intelligent
> /c0/u0 volume(s) = 1
> /c0/u0 name = xxx
> /c0/u0 serial number = yyy
> /c0/u0 Ignore ECC policy = off
> /c0/u0 Auto Verify Policy = off
> /c0/u0 Storsave Policy = protection
> /c0/u0 Command Queuing Policy = on
> /c0/u0 Rapid RAID Recovery setting = all
> /c0/u0 Parity Number = 2
> 
> Unit     UnitType  Status         %RCmpl  %V/I/M  Port  Stripe
> Size(GB)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> u0       RAID-6    OK             -       -       -     256K
> 12572.8 

So the RAID array looks OK, the RAID controller doesn't report any
particular problem. You said it was reported as 0 K. Where did you see
0 K reported?

What gives "dmesg | grep 3w-9xxx" ? and "tw_cli alarms" ? Was the
filesystem under heavy write when the problem occured ?

I'd start with launching a RAID verify, to detect and correct possible
on-disk coherency problems (it can't hurt anyway):

tw_cli /c0/u0 start verify

Then "tail -f /var/log/messages | grep 3w-9xxx" ...

I suppose that there are no problems to be discovered. Most probably
IOs to the array were lost because of the bus reset.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-23 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-23 13:27 XFS corruption on 3ware RAID6-volume Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 14:46 ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 15:01   ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 15:23     ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2011-02-24 10:20       ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-23 15:29     ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-23 15:37       ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 15:42         ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-24 10:25           ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-24 10:35       ` Erik Gulliksson
2011-02-24 11:01         ` Justin Piszcz
2011-02-24 12:14         ` Emmanuel Florac
2011-02-23 16:56 ` Stan Hoeppner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110223162316.45a49880@harpe.intellique.com \
    --to=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=erik@gulliksson.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox