From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p23FVKMh098772 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:31:22 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 382FC1DDF279 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 07:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DNPFitDxGDBHhFCv for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:34:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:34:10 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: convert ENOSPC inode flushing to use new syncd workqueue Message-ID: <20110303153410.GA27205@infradead.org> References: <1298412969-14389-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1298412969-14389-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1298412969-14389-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com I still don't see any point in having the ENOSPC flushing moved to a different context. Just add a mutex and flush inline, e.g. void xfs_flush_inodes( struct xfs_inode *ip) { struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount; if (!mutex_trylock(&xfs_syncd_lock)) return; /* someone else is flushing right now */ xfs_sync_data(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK); xfs_sync_data(mp, SYNC_TRYLOCK | SYNC_WAIT); xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC); mutex_unlock(&xfs_syncd_lock); } _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs