From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: kick inode writeback when low on memory
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:19:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110303161929.GA5795@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110303154819.GA3945@infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:48:19AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I don't think we'll be able to get around chaning the dirty_inode
> callback. We need a way to prevent the VFS from marking the inode
> dirty, otherwise we have no chance of reclaiming it.
>
> Except for that I think it's really simple:
>
> 1) we need to reintroduce the i_update_size flag or an equivalent to
> distinguish unlogged timestamp from unlogged size updates for fsync
> vs fdatasync. At that point we can stop looking at the VFS dirty
> bits in fsync.
> 2) ->dirty_inode needs to tag the inode as dirty in the inode radix
> tree
>
> With those minimal changes we should be set - we already
> callxfs_sync_attr from the sync_fs path, and xfs_sync_inode_attr
> properly picks up inodes with unlogged changes.
Actually xfs_sync_attr does not get called from the sync path right now,
which is a bit odd. But once we add it, possibly with an earlier
trylock pass and/or an inode cluster read-ahead the above plan still
stands.
What's also rather odd is how much we use xfs_sync_data - unlike the
inodes where our own code doing writeback based on disk order makes
a lot of sense data is actually handled very well by the core writeback
code. The two remaining callers of xfs_sync_data are
xfs_flush_inodes_work and xfs_quiesce_data. The former area really
belongs into this patchset - can you try what only calling
writeback_inodes* from the ENOSPC handler instead of doing our own stuff
does? It should give you the avoidance of double writeout for free, and
get rid of one of xfs_sync_data callers.
After that we just need to look into xfs_quiesce_data. The core
writeback code now does reliably writeback before calling into
->sync_fs, so the actual writeback should be superflous. We will still
need a log force after it, and we might need an iteration through all
inodes to do an xfs_ioend_wait, but this are can be simplified a lot.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 22:16 [RFC, PATCH 0/5] xfs: Reduce OOM kill problems under heavy load Dave Chinner
2011-02-22 22:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: introduce inode cluster buffer trylocks for xfs_iflush Dave Chinner
2011-03-03 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-03 22:04 ` Dave Chinner
2011-02-22 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: introduce a xfssyncd workqueue Dave Chinner
2011-02-22 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: convert ENOSPC inode flushing to use new syncd workqueue Dave Chinner
2011-03-03 15:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-03 22:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-04 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-02-22 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: introduce background inode reclaim work Dave Chinner
2011-03-03 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-03 22:43 ` Dave Chinner
2011-02-22 22:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: kick inode writeback when low on memory Dave Chinner
2011-03-02 3:06 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-02 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-03 2:42 ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-03 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-03-03 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-03-09 5:46 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110303161929.GA5795@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox