From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2AHQqTR113706 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:27:02 -0600 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:29:43 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: rework "dmapi" subtree build mechanism Message-ID: <20110310172943.GD13390@infradead.org> References: <201103041937.p24Jbk5W004828@stout.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103041937.p24Jbk5W004828@stout.americas.sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > LIB_SUBDIRS = include lib > TOOL_SUBDIRS = ltp src m4 > +ifeq ($(HAVE_DMAPI), true) > +TOOL_SUBDIRS += dmapi > +endif Does this work with the way we generate source tarballs on make dist? In xfsprogs we have special variables for source files that don't get build. > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +# > +# Copyright (c) 2011 SGI All Rights Reserved. > +# I think a license would be more useful than all rights reserved here. Except for that the patch looks sane to me, and having a consistent build system is a good thing. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs