From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2BA8GiJ154619 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:08:26 -0600 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 05:11:07 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: rework "dmapi" subtree build mechanism Message-ID: <20110311101107.GD11879@infradead.org> References: <201103041937.p24Jbk5W004828@stout.americas.sgi.com> <20110310172943.GD13390@infradead.org> <1299795372.2573.79.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1299795372.2573.79.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com > I'll add a boilerplate GPL statement in these new files. > What I used was simply mimicing what was present in the > other Makefiles. > > In order to avoid re-sending this big patch, may I get > your signoff/reviewed-by on that plan? I haven't looked at every detail, but it looks sane and close enough to the normal build system to me, so: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs