From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2M9vSRG011487 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:57:40 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id ED42E13EC162 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id z1YXD3TCXyE93GWX for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 03:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:00:17 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38 Message-ID: <20110322100017.GA3532@infradead.org> References: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52E8@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52E8@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Sean Noonan Cc: "'linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com'" , Martin Bligh , Trammell Hudson > We started testing with 2.6.38-rc7 and have seen this bug through to the .0 release. This does not appear to be present in 2.6.33, but we have not done testing in between. We have tested with ext4 and do not encounter this bug. Does reverting commit aea1b9532143218f8599ecedbbd6bfbf812385e1 fix the issue for you? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs