From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p2MNMIlW054921 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:22:23 -0500 Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 20C1B159D8AD for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nakgdQThY6bnHUKx for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:25:04 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: XFS memory allocation deadlock in 2.6.38 Message-ID: <20110322232504.GC15270@dastard> References: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52E8@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <081DDE43F61F3D43929A181B477DCA95639B52E8@MSXAOA6.twosigma.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Sean Noonan Cc: "'linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com'" , Martin Bligh , Trammell Hudson On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:46:04AM -0400, Sean Noonan wrote: > Using the attached program, we are able to reproduce this bug reliably. > $ make vmtest > $ ./vmtest /xfs/hugefile.dat $(( 16 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 )) # vmtest > /xfs/hugefile.dat: mapped 17179869184 bytes in 33822066943 ticks > 749660: avg 13339 max 234667 ticks > 371945: avg 26885 max 281616 ticks > --- > At this point, we see the following on the console: > [593492.694806] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250) > [593506.724367] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250) > [593524.837717] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250) > [593556.742386] XFS: possible memory allocation deadlock in kmem_alloc (mode:0x250) What is the configuration of the machine you are testing on? I can't reproduce this on a current 2.6.39-tot tree on a 2p/2GB RAM VM that has it's blockdev images on a single SATA drive.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs