From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p2NBa62t089358 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:36:11 -0500 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E45FBB29371 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Q8iUTHgnri807SOM for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 04:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:38:48 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs: outstanding patches for 2.6.39 Message-ID: <20110323113848.GC26611@dastard> References: <1300860870-15471-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20110323111842.GA18267@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110323111842.GA18267@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: aelder@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:18:42AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think we'll need the inode OOM fixes for .39, too. But if you need > some more time for them it's fine to wait for them for a while. They are not ready yet. When i have them sorted out, I'll post them as 2.6.39 candidates. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs