From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p2NCDDrY091073 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:13:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:16:13 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills Message-ID: <20110323121613.GA468@infradead.org> References: <20110322195550.260682574@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110322200137.280301318@bombadil.infradead.org> <1300833051.2875.275.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1300833051.2875.275.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:30:51PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:55 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Avoid forcing out busy extent when moving blocks from/to the AGFL. We > > Without thinking a bit about it, it wasn't clear why doing > this was OK to do. It would be nice to record a one-sentence > justification of why we don't need to force busy extents out > in this case. I've added a sentence, but it seems rather pointless. > achieve this fixed. > > the callers that need it, and by moving the busy list insert from > > xfs_free_ag_extent extent which is used both by AGFL refills and real > ^^^^^ drop this word fixed. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs