From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p2NCEXQI091163 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:14:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:17:33 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] xfs: do not immediately reuse busy extent ranges Message-ID: <20110323121733.GC468@infradead.org> References: <20110322195550.260682574@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110322200137.474878707@bombadil.infradead.org> <1300833059.2875.276.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1300833059.2875.276.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 05:30:59PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > Again, this looks nearly identical to your last version. > On that one, I suggested rewording a comment, and you > said "ok." You did not do so in this version, which I > guess is fine. I just want to know whether you intended > to. If so I'll give you a chance to post an update; if > not I can take this one as-is. Sorry, I fixe half of what you pointed out and postponed the comment rewrite. I've taken your version of the comments for the next spin. Still not sure what to do about the magic 4, though. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs