From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2SC4EYe165388 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:04:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:07:22 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: optimize AGFL refills Message-ID: <20110328120722.GA18346@infradead.org> References: <20110322195550.260682574@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110322200137.280301318@bombadil.infradead.org> <1300833051.2875.275.camel@doink> <20110323121613.GA468@infradead.org> <1301086981.2537.687.camel@doink> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1301086981.2537.687.camel@doink> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com > The reason it was not obvious is because the case you're > treating is specifically when moving extents (blocks, > really) between the free list and the free btrees, in > xfs_alloc_fix_freelist(). You still need to force it > out when allocating and freeing "actually used" blocks, > which could also be considered "moving blocks from/to > the AGFL." I've updated the comment to make that more clear. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs