From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p33AtBCi101846 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:55:14 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3655E15AE1FA for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 03:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GikGlVZu1jyMkIy2 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 03:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 06:58:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix xfs_debug warnings Message-ID: <20110403105823.GA3872@infradead.org> References: <20110402181340.GA12639@infradead.org> <20110402220905.GA1861@infradead.org> <20110403001648.GH6957@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110403001648.GH6957@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:16:48AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Looks good, though I don't get those warnings using gcc-4.4.4. I > guess it's gcc-4.6 issuing the warnings? Debian testing recently updated to gcc 4.5.2 from gcc 4.4.x, I think that's when I started to see them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs